Reset to default value (bug?)
- lazor96
-
Offline Autor
- Neues Mitglied
-
- Beiträge: 9
- Dank erhalten: 11
Dear Jeti,
if you enter asymmetrical values lets say in the dual rates or in the butterfly menu and you swith back to symmetric and then try to reset the value to default by holding the scrollwhel for a few seconds it will reset the selected value to 0 but the second value is not set back to 0. It substracts the diffference needed to set the other value to 0 which leads to a wrong value.
For example:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 200% | s2: 100%
If you now select symmatrical and then select the right value and press and hold the scrollwheel for a few seconds the values will be the following:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 100% | s2: 0%
Example 2:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 0% | s2: 200%
After resetting the right value with symmetrical active:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: -200% | s2: 0%
From my understanding it should reset both values to 0, even if symmetrical is active or am I wrong?
I don't know if this is a bug or a feature so if I'm wrong please let me know.
Best regards
Lars
if you enter asymmetrical values lets say in the dual rates or in the butterfly menu and you swith back to symmetric and then try to reset the value to default by holding the scrollwhel for a few seconds it will reset the selected value to 0 but the second value is not set back to 0. It substracts the diffference needed to set the other value to 0 which leads to a wrong value.
For example:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 200% | s2: 100%
If you now select symmatrical and then select the right value and press and hold the scrollwheel for a few seconds the values will be the following:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 100% | s2: 0%
Example 2:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: 0% | s2: 200%
After resetting the right value with symmetrical active:
Butterfly Flap Setting: s1: -200% | s2: 0%
From my understanding it should reset both values to 0, even if symmetrical is active or am I wrong?
I don't know if this is a bug or a feature so if I'm wrong please let me know.

Best regards
Lars
von lazor96
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- skyfreak
-
Offline
- Platinum Mitglied
-
- Beiträge: 2946
- Dank erhalten: 1447
even though it is really just a minor issue
given the fact that I would say way more than 50% of the users do not even know about that feature nor the option to set different step sizes for scrolling ...
but in general you are right
a tiny little bug
given the fact that I would say way more than 50% of the users do not even know about that feature nor the option to set different step sizes for scrolling ...
but in general you are right
a tiny little bug

Fliegergruss
GUIDO
_________________________________________________________
Too many dicks on the dance floor.
Too many dicks!
GUIDO
_________________________________________________________
Too many dicks on the dance floor.
Too many dicks!
Last Edit:27 März 2023 14:18
von skyfreak
Letzte Änderung: 27 März 2023 14:18 von skyfreak.
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: lazor96
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- lazor96
-
Offline Autor
- Neues Mitglied
-
- Beiträge: 9
- Dank erhalten: 11
Hi skyfreak,
yes, I know that it is a very rare case but I am a software programmer myself and I'm always happy if people tell me about bugs they found.
Even if these are very small and no critical bugs, these can be corrected easily.
S I wanted to tell it to the jeti software developers so they can correct this in a future update if they want.
Best regards
Lars
yes, I know that it is a very rare case but I am a software programmer myself and I'm always happy if people tell me about bugs they found.
Even if these are very small and no critical bugs, these can be corrected easily.
S I wanted to tell it to the jeti software developers so they can correct this in a future update if they want.

Best regards
Lars
von lazor96
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: skyfreak
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Ladezeit der Seite: 0.982 Sekunden