Extensions / improvement of the Q value
- e-modell
- Offline Autor
- Elite Mitglied
- Beiträge: 299
- Dank erhalten: 318
Much has already been said about the Q value. Unfortunately, it is not possible to read the quality of the transmitted data packets from the transmitter and correctly received data packets at the receiver from the Q value. I would appreciate the following realization in the near future. Other systems can do that already.
Please realize two Q-values.
1. TX-Q for the connection transmitter -> receiver
2. RX-Q for the connection receiver -> transmitter (return channel)
Better would be the exact indication of lost data packets at each receiver antenna during a flight.
Display the transmission quality in "%", "dBm" or "% R".
For example, 50 lost data packets / s are regarded as 0% RSSI, and 0 lost data packets / s is 100%
It would be a real improvement!
With these values you can estimate the quality of the transmission and optimize the position of the antennas in the model.
best regards
Bernd
Please realize two Q-values.
1. TX-Q for the connection transmitter -> receiver
2. RX-Q for the connection receiver -> transmitter (return channel)
Better would be the exact indication of lost data packets at each receiver antenna during a flight.
Display the transmission quality in "%", "dBm" or "% R".
For example, 50 lost data packets / s are regarded as 0% RSSI, and 0 lost data packets / s is 100%
It would be a real improvement!
With these values you can estimate the quality of the transmission and optimize the position of the antennas in the model.
best regards
Bernd
von e-modell
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: GeGie, Flugsaurier, sunbeam, oesti, Ba-Nause, Jochen, Eifelblitz, verbindung, STer, G0NZ0 und 14 andere Leute haben sich zudem bedankt.
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- STer
- Offline
- Senior Mitglied
- Beiträge: 75
- Dank erhalten: 50
I agree to the statement og Bernd and would be happy if Jeti would realize the suggestion of Bernd in the near future.
Kind regards,
STer
Kind regards,
STer
von STer
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: oesti, verbindung, marap, skyfreak, Hermann, patrfran1974, e-modell
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- Blademaster
- Visitor
- Dank erhalten: 0
Dear Jeti Team,
there are consistently discussions about the telemetry values A1 / A2 and Q.
In case of dropping values or warnings it's not possible to determine if it's only a problem
of the insignificant back channel or if the problem also exits in the important forward channel.
So I'm sure, you can make many Jeti user happy by expanding the telemetry values, so that it's getting
possible to observe the forward and back channel separately.
Best regards,
Dirk
there are consistently discussions about the telemetry values A1 / A2 and Q.
In case of dropping values or warnings it's not possible to determine if it's only a problem
of the insignificant back channel or if the problem also exits in the important forward channel.
So I'm sure, you can make many Jeti user happy by expanding the telemetry values, so that it's getting
possible to observe the forward and back channel separately.
Best regards,
Dirk
von Blademaster
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Ladezeit der Seite: 1.002 Sekunden