Willkommen, Gast
Benutzername: Passwort: Angemeldet bleiben:
  • Seite:
  • 1

THEMA:

Extensions / improvement of the Q value 13 Jun 2018 22:00 #1

  • e-modell
  • e-modells Avatar Autor
  • Offline
  • Gold Boarder
  • Gold Boarder
  • Beiträge: 294
  • Dank erhalten: 318
Much has already been said about the Q value. Unfortunately, it is not possible to read the quality of the transmitted data packets from the transmitter and correctly received data packets at the receiver from the Q value. I would appreciate the following realization in the near future. Other systems can do that already.
Please realize two Q-values.
1. TX-Q for the connection transmitter -> receiver
2. RX-Q for the connection receiver -> transmitter (return channel)
Better would be the exact indication of lost data packets at each receiver antenna during a flight.
Display the transmission quality in "%", "dBm" or "% R".
For example, 50 lost data packets / s are regarded as 0% RSSI, and 0 lost data packets / s is 100%
It would be a real improvement!
With these values you can estimate the quality of the transmission and optimize the position of the antennas in the model.

best regards
Bernd
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: GeGie, Flugsaurier, sunbeam, oesti, Ba-Nause, Jochen, Eifelblitz, verbindung, STer, G0NZ0 und 14 andere Leute haben sich zudem bedankt.

Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.

Extensions / improvement of the Q value 04 Jul 2018 18:22 #2

  • STer
  • STers Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • Senior Boarder
  • Beiträge: 71
  • Dank erhalten: 47
I agree to the statement og Bernd and would be happy if Jeti would realize the suggestion of Bernd in the near future.

Kind regards,

STer
Folgende Benutzer bedankten sich: oesti, verbindung, marap, skyfreak, Hermann, patrfran1974, e-modell

Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.

Extensions / improvement of the Q value 05 Jul 2018 14:32 #3

  • Blademaster
  • Blademasters Avatar
  • Besucher
  • Besucher
Dear Jeti Team,

there are consistently discussions about the telemetry values A1 / A2 and Q.

In case of dropping values or warnings it's not possible to determine if it's only a problem
of the insignificant back channel or if the problem also exits in the important forward channel.

So I'm sure, you can make many Jeti user happy by expanding the telemetry values, so that it's getting
possible to observe the forward and back channel separately.


Best regards,
Dirk

Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.

  • Seite:
  • 1
Ladezeit der Seite: 0.186 Sekunden
Powered by Kunena Forum