Rate control mix support
- arniemansell
- Offline Autor
- Neues Mitglied
- Beiträge: 15
- Dank erhalten: 0
Raf + PW
I went and tried the second method again and it worked a treat. Must have been finger trouble before. That looks like it is the true solution I've been looking for.
Time wasn't waisted though - I now know all about logical switches too
Many thanks,
A
I went and tried the second method again and it worked a treat. Must have been finger trouble before. That looks like it is the true solution I've been looking for.
Time wasn't waisted though - I now know all about logical switches too
Many thanks,
A
von arniemansell
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- PW
- Offline
- Moderator
- Beiträge: 9600
- Dank erhalten: 3728
Hi,
so you learned a lot about the Jeti TX
Have fun with this great radio.
Regards
PW
so you learned a lot about the Jeti TX
Have fun with this great radio.
Regards
PW
Rechtsbeistand u.a. bei "Modellflugproblemen"etc. : Rechtsanwälte Wessels & Partner, Tel.: 02362/27065
PW Modellbautechnik ( Jeti Kombiangebote, Beratung/Einstellservice etc.)
PW Modellbautechnik ( Jeti Kombiangebote, Beratung/Einstellservice etc.)
Last Edit:16 Mai 2013 08:18
von PW
Letzte Änderung: 16 Mai 2013 08:18 von PW.
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
- arniemansell
- Offline Autor
- Neues Mitglied
- Beiträge: 15
- Dank erhalten: 0
Just to follow up on this thread now that I've used it in anger.
In the end I preferred the solution based on a sequence of logical switches, the reason being that it allows the reduction in rudder rate to be set as a percentage regardless of any exponential or dual rates that may or may not be switched in.
It works better with the logical switches arranged so that, for example, as the throttle is opened from idle:
All switches off
L1 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L1 and L2 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5%)
L1 and L2 and L3 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5% + 5%)
etc.
The reason for this is that delay can be added to smooth the transitions somewhat. But if the switches are arranged:
All switches off
L1 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L2 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -55%
L3 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -60%
etc.
the delay function causes some very strange behaviour at transitions.
Cheers,
A
In the end I preferred the solution based on a sequence of logical switches, the reason being that it allows the reduction in rudder rate to be set as a percentage regardless of any exponential or dual rates that may or may not be switched in.
It works better with the logical switches arranged so that, for example, as the throttle is opened from idle:
All switches off
L1 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L1 and L2 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5%)
L1 and L2 and L3 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5% + 5%)
etc.
The reason for this is that delay can be added to smooth the transitions somewhat. But if the switches are arranged:
All switches off
L1 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L2 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -55%
L3 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -60%
etc.
the delay function causes some very strange behaviour at transitions.
Cheers,
A
von arniemansell
Bitte Anmelden oder Registrieren um der Konversation beizutreten.
Ladezeit der Seite: 0.943 Sekunden